I now see I could've done a mistake in the first place, by posting what was
meant to be a naive and peaceful comment.
It's now evident to me that my initial wording wasn't perfectly chosen to
reflect the naive intent of my comment.
You just said that it "should" be female, which implies that it "should" not
be male, i.e. that you are categorically opposed to all male name
I'm not a native english speaker, but you seem to be, so I guess your
exegesis of my words is to be considered accurate.
If that's the case, I must make ammends for messing up with words:
I am not opposed to giving Trisuel 9 a male name.
I'm totally ok with male names.
Furthermore, I'd like to assure you and everybody else that I did not want to
start any "sex equality" quarrel, and the intent behind my original post had
nothing to do with that.
If my words did suggest such a scenario, then *it's my own fault* and I'm
sorry about all the noise.
I also want to make clear that I have no agenda to be pushed on this forum.
A word of advice: (....)
I'd give you mine, If I may... most of the times, harsh quarrels can be
avoided by giving others the "benefit of the doubt", instead of blindly
pinning names on them before they have the opportunity to clarify their
That said, I have no acrimony on you personally. I think we just took an
unfortunate path of misunderstanding.